Let’s work together to find a solution
Rely on AVANA Capital to help preserve your wealth and create growth for your business.
A hotel developer in Nashville put a 120-room select-service site under contract last spring. He had the land, the IHG flag approval, a general contractor he’d worked with on three prior projects, and a pro forma showing 1.31x DSCR at stabilization. The first three banks he approached offered him construction loans at 60–65% loan-to-cost. He needed 70% to make the equity stack work. All three declined to move. Four months later, he found a construction program specifically designed for flagged hotel developers. He closed at 75% LTC. The project broke ground on schedule.
That gap — between what conventional banks offer hotel developers and what the market actually requires — is the defining financing problem in hospitality construction right now. This guide explains how hotel construction financing works, what lenders underwrite, which programs exist for developers in 2026, and how to structure a deal that closes.
Key Takeaways
- Hotel construction loans typically fund 65–75% of total project cost (LTC), with flagged hotel programs reaching the upper end
- Current rates range from 6.25–7.25% (conventional bank) to 7.5–10% (private/bridge construction lenders)
- The AVANA-IHG co-lending program provides up to 75% LTC for developers building under select IHG brands — with $250M committed
- Lenders underwrite hotel construction on sponsor experience, brand approval, pro forma RevPAR benchmarks, and exit credibility — not primarily on the borrower’s balance sheet
- Planning the bridge-to-permanent exit from day one is essential — bridge construction loans mature and the refinance path needs to be built into the deal structure upfront
How Hotel Construction Loans Work
Hotel construction financing is structured differently from a standard acquisition loan or a conventional permanent mortgage. Understanding the structure is the prerequisite for knowing which lender to approach and what terms to negotiate.
The Construction Draw Structure
Rather than a single disbursement at closing, a hotel construction loan funds the project in draws — sequential disbursements tied to verified construction milestones. Each draw requires a third-party inspection confirming that the work represented has been completed and that the funds will be used for the next phase.
Standard hotel construction milestone draws typically follow this sequence: site preparation and grading, foundation, structural framing, mechanical/electrical/plumbing (MEP) rough-ins, drywall and interior finishes, and final inspections and certificate of occupancy. The number and structure of draws varies by lender and project complexity — a limited-service build with a standard prototypical design typically has fewer draw stages than a full-service property with custom interior specifications.
The practical implication for developers is documentation. Every draw request requires updated construction cost reports, an architect’s certification of completion to date, and in most cases an independent inspector’s sign-off. Delays in submitting draw documentation extend the construction timeline and drive up interest reserve costs. ### Interest Reserves
Because the hotel generates no revenue during construction, most lenders require an interest reserve — a funded escrow account that makes loan payments during the construction period. The reserve is sized based on the projected construction timeline, the full loan amount, and the loan’s interest rate.
For a $15M construction loan at 8% over an 18-month build, the interest reserve would be approximately $1.8M. That reserve is included in the total project cost and therefore part of the LTC calculation. Developers who underestimate the reserve — or who don’t account for construction delays — can find themselves short on equity when the actual timeline runs past projections.
Mini-Perm Conversion and Exit
Most hotel construction loans include a mini-perm period — a short-term extension (typically 12–24 months) after construction completion that gives the hotel time to reach stabilized occupancy before refinancing into permanent debt. The mini-perm is not a separate loan; it’s a provision built into the construction loan that automatically converts on certificate of occupancy.
After the mini-perm period, the exit path is typically refinancing into a conventional commercial mortgage, CMBS financing, or a life company loan — all of which underwrite to the hotel’s actual operating history. The construction lender’s job ends at stabilization; the permanent lender’s job begins there.
Types of Hotel Construction Financing
Developers in 2026 have access to several distinct financing structures for hotel construction. Each is appropriate for different deal profiles, project sizes, and sponsor backgrounds.
Conventional Bank Construction Loans
Traditional banks — regional banks and national lenders with hospitality CRE desks — typically offer hotel construction loans at 60–65% LTC. They require the most documentation, have the longest approval timelines (60–90 days), and apply the most rigorous underwriting: two years of sponsor operating history, personal guarantees, and comprehensive pro formas backed by competitive set data.
Banks are appropriate for well-capitalized, repeat developers with existing banking relationships and deals that don’t require the leverage ceiling. The rate advantage (currently 6.25–7.25%) comes with those trade-offs.
SBA 504 Hotel Construction Loans
The Small Business Administration’s 504 program can fund hotel construction for owner-operators — developers who intend to operate the hotel as their primary business. The 504 structure (50% conventional / 40% CDC / 10% borrower equity) creates a blended interest rate significantly below conventional bank pricing, typically in the 6–6.5% range on a 25-year amortization.
The program is best suited for midscale flagged properties under $12M in the CDC portion, and works for developers who meet SBA eligibility requirements: US citizen or permanent resident principals, owner-operator intent, project size within program caps. Investment hotels held by passive investors do not qualify.
For a complete breakdown of eligibility, documentation requirements, and how SBA 504 compares to conventional construction financing, see our guide to SBA 504 hotel construction loans.
Bridge Construction Loans
Bridge lenders — private credit funds, debt funds, and specialty hospitality lenders — provide construction financing for deals that fall outside conventional bank credit boxes. This includes ground-up projects where the sponsor is a first-time hotel developer (but has relevant adjacent experience), distressed or rescue capital situations where a construction project has lost its original lender mid-build, and predevelopment financing while a permanent construction loan is being arranged.
Bridge construction loans close faster (21–45 days), underwrite more flexibly, and reach higher leverage in some programs — but carry higher rates (7.5–10%+) and shorter terms. AVANA’s bridge program, backed by a joint venture with Oaktree Capital, is specifically designed to move at the pace hotel developers need.
For specific scenarios where a bridge construction loan is the right tool — including rescue capital and predevelopment bridge — see our guide to hotel construction bridge loans.
Mezzanine Financing
When the senior construction loan maxes out at 65% LTC and the developer needs 75–80% total leverage, mezzanine debt fills the gap between the senior loan and the developer’s equity position. Mezz is subordinate to the senior construction loan and commands significantly higher rates — typically 12–15% — reflecting the subordinated position in the capital stack.
A $20M hotel project at 65% senior LTC ($13M senior) with 15% mezz ($3M) and 20% equity ($4M) gives the developer the leverage they need to proceed while the senior lender stays within their credit box. The intercreditor agreement between the senior and mezz lender governs workout procedures and default rights.
Mezzanine is appropriate for sophisticated developers with repeat track records where the senior loan constraint is a leverage ceiling rather than a credit quality issue.
The AVANA-IHG Co-Lending Program
The most significant development in hotel construction financing in 2025–2026 is the AVANA-IHG co-lending program, announced in January 2025, with $250M committed for US-based hotel development projects. The program is purpose-built for developers building under select IHG Hotels & Resorts brands, and it addresses the specific leverage gap that has kept flagged hotel development below feasibility for many developers.
The AVANA-IHG program provides up to 75% LTC — compared to the 60–65% conventional banks offer — on qualifying IHG-branded projects. The eligible brands include EVEN Hotels, avid hotels, Atwell Suites, and Holiday Inn properties. For developers who have flag approval in hand but cannot make the equity stack work at conventional bank leverage, this program provides a direct path forward.
For a detailed breakdown of the program structure, eligible brands, and how to apply, see our dedicated guide to IHG hotel construction financing.
Loan Amounts, LTC, and LTV — What the Numbers Mean
Hotel construction lenders apply two distinct leverage metrics: loan-to-cost (LTC) and loan-to-value (LTV). Most developers focus on LTC, but lenders apply both — and use the lower of the two calculations to determine the maximum loan amount.
Loan-to-Cost (LTC)
LTC measures the loan amount as a percentage of total project cost. Total project cost includes land acquisition (if not already owned), hard construction costs (site work, foundation, framing, MEP, finishes, FF&E), soft costs (architecture, engineering, permits, legal, financing costs), and the interest reserve.
Standard hotel construction programs lend at 65–75% LTC depending on lender, property type, brand, and sponsor strength. The AVANA-IHG program provides 75% LTC for qualifying IHG projects — the ceiling for most programs today.
LTC math on a 120-room midscale project: – Land: $2M – Hard construction costs: $175K/room × 120 rooms = $21M – Soft costs (15%): $3.15M – Interest reserve: $2.1M – Total project cost: $28.25M – At 65% LTC: $18.36M loan / $9.89M equity – At 75% LTC: $21.19M loan / $7.06M equity
The difference between 65% and 75% LTC is $2.83M in equity that the developer doesn’t have to raise — or in returns that they don’t have to share with a preferred equity partner.
Loan-to-Value (LTV)
LTV measures the loan amount against the property’s appraised value at completion. Because hotels are income-producing assets, the as-completed appraisal applies the income approach — capitalizing projected stabilized NOI at a market cap rate to derive the completed property value.
If a hotel project has a $28.25M total cost but an as-completed appraisal of $35M (reflecting development upside), the LTV on a $21M loan is 60% — well within most programs’ constraints. If the appraisal comes in at $26M (a value-destructive project), the same loan represents 80.8% LTV and will be constrained below LTC.
Lenders run both calculations and lend to the more conservative limit. This is why an experienced appraisal — with current comparable sales and a realistic RevPAR stabilization timeline — matters as much as the cost budget.
Per-Room Cost Benchmarks by Property Class
Per-room construction costs in 2026 vary significantly by property class:
| Property Class | Per-Room Cost | Example 100-Room Project |
|---|---|---|
| Economy / Limited Service | $100,000–$140,000 | $10M–$14M |
| Midscale Select Service | $140,000–$200,000 | $14M–$20M |
| Upscale / Upper-Midscale | $200,000–$350,000 | $20M–$35M |
| Luxury / Full Service | $400,000–$600,000+ | $40M–$60M+ |
These benchmarks include hard construction costs but not land acquisition, soft costs, FF&E, or interest reserves. Developers should budget 15–20% additional for soft costs and 8–12% for FF&E depending on brand standards. —
Hotel Construction Loan Rates in 2026
Rates for hotel construction financing vary by loan type, leverage, project risk, and lender — but the current range gives developers a clear picture of what to expect when modeling project economics.
| Loan Type | Rate Range | Term | LTC Typical |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conventional Bank | 6.25%–7.25% | 18–36 months + mini-perm | 60–65% |
| SBA 504 (blended) | ~6.0%–6.5% | 25 years (perm portion) | Up to 90% (with 10% equity) |
| AVANA-IHG Program | Competitive blended rate | Project timeline | Up to 75% |
| Private / Bridge Construction | 7.5%–10.0% | 12–36 months | 65–75% |
| Mezzanine | 12%–15% | Co-terminus with senior | 15–20% of project cost |
Three factors drive where a specific hotel construction loan lands within these ranges:
LTC and leverage position. Higher leverage carries higher rate. A 75% LTC loan on a brand-new prototypical build prices differently than a 65% LTC loan on the same project.
Sponsor experience and credit quality. A developer with three completed IHG-flagged projects and a clean credit history commands tighter pricing than a first-time developer in the same capital structure. Lenders price the residual human risk in a construction project.
Market conditions and project location. Primary markets with deep hotel demand and established brand penetration carry lower risk premiums than secondary or tertiary markets where occupancy ramp-up is less predictable.
For a comprehensive analysis of current hotel construction loan rates — including what moves the needle and how to position your deal to hit the lower end of the range — see our dedicated guide to hotel construction loan rates.
What Lenders Underwrite on Hotel Construction
Understanding what a hotel construction lender actually evaluates — beyond the surface checklist — gives developers the ability to package a deal that closes rather than one that stalls in underwriting.
Sponsor Experience and Track Record
Hotel construction carries project execution risk that goes beyond what a financial statement can capture. Lenders want to see that the development team has delivered comparable projects: similar flags, similar scale, similar market type. A GCC-based developer who has built five Holiday Inn properties internationally and is doing their first US project is a very different credit conversation than a first-time hospitality developer with no comparable track record.
What counts as relevant experience: completed construction projects in hospitality or adjacent asset classes (multifamily or mixed-use with comparable scope), documented GC relationships, and evidence of successful property improvement plan (PIP) completion if the developer has operated flagged hotels previously.
Brand Approval
For flagged hotel construction, lenders require brand approval — documented confirmation from the franchise (IHG, Marriott, Hilton, Hyatt) that the project meets brand standards, the developer meets franchise requirements, and the specific location is approved for that flag. Brand approval is not automatic and the process has its own timeline — developers should pursue it in parallel with financing, not after.
Lenders treat brand approval as a risk mitigant. A flagged hotel has brand marketing support, reservation system access, loyalty program traffic, and mandatory quality standards — all of which reduce occupancy ramp-up risk compared to an independent hotel in the same market.
Pro Forma and Market Support
The underwrite for a hotel construction loan centers on the projected performance of the completed property: what RevPAR (revenue per available room) will the hotel achieve at stabilization, what ADR (average daily rate) and occupancy do competitive set data support, and what NOI does that revenue generate relative to the debt service at the proposed loan amount?
Lenders require the pro forma to be anchored in competitive set data — STR reports showing actual trailing RevPAR for comparable properties in the same market. A projection that assumes the subject property will outperform the comp set without a documented operational reason (superior brand, distinct location advantage, brand-new product in an older market) will be challenged in underwriting.
DSCR thresholds for hotel construction typically target 1.25–1.30x at stabilization. Lenders underwrite to stabilized NOI, not construction-phase cash flow.
Exit Strategy
The construction lender’s first question after the project risk discussion is always: how does this loan get paid off? The three credible exits for hotel construction are (1) refinance into conventional permanent debt after the mini-perm period using the hotel’s actual operating history, (2) sale of the completed stabilized property, and (3) recapitalization with institutional equity partners who bring the entity into the conventional bank credit box.
Vague exit language — “we’ll refinance when the market is right” — flags a deal that hasn’t been fully planned. A credible exit requires projected occupancy ramp-up timeline, a rate assumption for the permanent loan, and a clear path to DSCR coverage on permanent debt.
For the complete underwriting picture — including documentation checklists and what lenders commonly flag in due diligence — see our guide to hotel construction loan requirements.
Flagged vs. Unflagged Hotel Financing: How Brand Affects Your Loan
The choice between a flagged (branded) hotel and an independent development is not just an operational decision — it materially affects the financing terms available.
Flagged hotels qualify for higher leverage from most construction lenders. The AVANA-IHG program is the clearest example: up to 75% LTC specifically for IHG-branded development. Independent hotels, without the brand marketing system and reservation infrastructure, typically max out at 65% LTC — the conventional bank ceiling.
Beyond leverage, flagged hotels carry lower occupancy ramp-up risk in lender models. A new Holiday Inn Express in a market with established brand penetration has a predictable ramp-up trajectory supported by IHG’s loyalty program and reservation system ⚠️ [confirm current IHG loyalty program membership figure with the marketing/PR team before publishing — verify against IHG’s most recent investor or press materials rather than citing a specific member count here]. An independent hotel in the same market relies entirely on the operator’s own marketing and distribution — a risk lenders price with wider spreads or lower LTC.
Brand approval does add a step and a timeline to hotel development financing. The franchise application process for major brands can take 60–90 days, and developers who haven’t started that process before approaching lenders will face delays. Starting brand approval in parallel with the financing process — not after — is the correct sequence. —
The AVANA-IHG Construction Program: Purpose-Built for Flagged Developers
The AVANA-IHG co-lending construction program was announced in January 2025 with $250M committed to US-based hotel development projects under select IHG brands. The program was developed specifically because the conventional bank construction financing market wasn’t meeting the needs of the IHG development community: banks lending at 60–65% LTC were requiring equity contributions that made otherwise viable projects infeasible.
The program provides up to 75% LTC — 10–15 percentage points above what banks typically offer. The covered brands include EVEN Hotels, avid hotels, Atwell Suites, and Holiday Inn properties. Developers must have IHG brand approval in hand and meet AVANA’s standard underwriting criteria: sponsor experience, creditworthiness, viable pro forma, and a clear exit strategy.
The partnership with IHG Hotels & Resorts brings an additional layer that distinguishes this program from standalone private construction lending: IHG brand support during the development process, access to the IHG development team, and the credibility that comes from a franchisor co-lending alongside the developer. This isn’t a lender using a brand relationship as marketing — it’s a structural partnership in which both IHG and AVANA have aligned interest in the project’s success.
For a complete guide to the program — including how it works, which brands qualify, and the application process — see our detailed breakdown of the AVANA-IHG construction program.
Hotel Renovation Financing and Property Improvement Plans
Not all hotel construction financing is ground-up development. Substantial renovation projects — particularly brand-mandated property improvement plans (PIPs) — often require the same level of financing sophistication as new construction.
PIPs are mandatory renovation requirements that franchisors impose when a hotel changes ownership, when a brand flag is being added to an existing independent property, or when an existing franchisee’s property falls below brand standards during periodic inspections. PIPs can range from cosmetic ($500K–$2M on a smaller property) to substantial structural renovation ($8M–$20M+ on a full-service hotel).
The financing options for PIPs mirror those for construction: bridge renovation loans that fund the capital improvements and convert to permanent financing post-renovation, renovation tranches added to an existing mortgage at refinance, and in some cases C-PACE financing for eligible energy-efficiency and environmental improvements that qualify as “C-PACE improvements” under applicable state programs.
Key underwriting differences from ground-up construction: the existing property has an operating history (positive for cash flow modeling, potentially negative if the NOI reflects deferred maintenance), and the renovation period is typically shorter than new construction — which changes the interest reserve sizing and draw schedule. —
Planning Your Bridge-to-Permanent Exit
One of the most consistent mistakes developers make in hotel construction financing is treating the construction loan as the endpoint rather than the first leg of a two-part financing structure.
Construction loans — whether conventional bank, private, or program-specific — are short-term instruments. They mature. When the construction loan matures and the hotel has reached stabilized occupancy, the developer needs a clear refinance path into permanent financing: a conventional commercial mortgage, CMBS loan, or life company financing based on the hotel’s actual operating performance.
The permanent lender underwrites the same metrics the construction lender projected: RevPAR, ADR, occupancy, NOI, and DSCR. The difference is that the permanent lender is using the actual trailing 12-month figures — not a projection. If the construction lender’s pro forma assumed 68% occupancy at a $145 ADR and the hotel is actually running at 71% at $152 ADR, the refinance is straightforward. If performance is materially below projection, the developer may face a maturity extension request or a gap between the construction loan payoff and what permanent financing will support.
Three practices that protect the exit:
Build in realistic ramp-up timelines. A new limited-service hotel in an established market with a major flag typically reaches 65–70% occupancy within 12–18 months. Underwriting to 80% occupancy by month 12 creates a gap when the permanent lender sees the actual trailing numbers.
Size the interest reserve conservatively. Construction delays are common. An 18-month build with a 6-month buffer in the interest reserve costs less than a maturity extension negotiation if the project runs long.
Engage the permanent lender early. Having a term sheet conversation with a CMBS conduit or life company lender during the construction phase — before the loan matures — gives the developer visibility into refinance assumptions and avoids a rushed permanent financing process.
AVANA Capital offers construction financing for ground-up hotel development and bridge loans for transitional situations. Both programs are designed to work in concert with a clear permanent financing exit — not to stand alone.
Frequently Asked Questions
Conclusion
Hotel construction financing in 2026 is available, active, and structurally accessible for developers who understand which programs align with their project and come to lenders with a complete deal. The gap is not capital — $250M in the AVANA-IHG program alone demonstrates committed capital for qualified projects. The gap is preparation: developers who understand LTC math, have brand approval in hand, can back their pro forma with competitive set data, and have a credible exit plan get their projects financed. Developers who don’t are the ones watching their deals trade to someone else.
Related Articles
Explore more market insights